Below are some news and media articles about ACB Tracking:
January 2017 - Toronto Globe & Mail
Help! How do I figure out my ETF’s capital gain?
Saturday, January 27, 2017
In February, 2001, I bought 91 shares of the iUnits S&P/TSX 60 exchange-traded fund for a total cost of $4,520.70. In October, 2016, I sold 364 units of the iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ticker: XIU) for total proceeds of $7,816.01. It appears there was a stock split at some point because I have no record of further purchases. Any clue how I should report this investment when filing my 2016 tax return?
I chose this reader’s question because it touches on a number of issues that affect the calculation of capital gains – a process that can be particularly tricky with ETFs.
First, let’s deal with the stock split. As the reader indicated, the iShares (formerly iUnits) S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF did indeed split its units four-for-one in 2008. The key thing to know about stock splits is that, while they affect the adjusted cost base (ACB) per unit, they do not change the investor’s total cost base. In this case, the reader has four times as many units but his total initial cost is still $4,520.70.
So, can he just subtract his cost of $4,520.70 from his sale proceeds of $7,816.01 to calculate his capital gain? Nope. It’s not that simple.
With ETFs (and mutual funds), there are two other key pieces of information you need to know in order to determine capital gains or losses. They are return of capital and reinvested distributions. Let’s look at each of these in turn.
Return of capital (ROC) is the portion of a distribution that does not consist of dividends, interest or realized capital gains. ROC is not immediately taxable; rather, it is subtracted from the ACB of the investment, which has the effect of increasing the capital gain (or reducing the capital loss) when the units are ultimately sold. ROC (also known as a “cost base adjustment”) is identified on your T3 tax slip and also on your year-end brokerage statements.
What if you haven’t kept all your records? No worries. Every year around February, iShares (and other ETF providers) publish the “distribution characteristics” – including the amount of ROC – of each of its ETFs for the previous calendar year. This information is available on the BlackRock Canada website under “Resources” and “Tax Information Centre.”
Unfortunately, the annual data only go back a few years. To find longer-term ROC information, you’ll have to go to the specific web page for XIU. (Once there, look for the heading “distributions” and click on “view full chart.” Next, click on “calendar year” and “table.” Finally, scroll down until you see a bar that you can slide to the right to reveal more columns, including “return of capital.”)
I added up all of XIU’s ROC distributions from 2001 through 2015 and got 31.63 cents a unit. Multiplied by 364 units, that’s total ROC of $115.13 that must be subtracted from the ACB (in addition to any ROC that appears on the investor’s 2016 T3).
Now, let’s turn to XIU’s reinvested distributions. These amounts – also known as phantom distributions – usually consist largely of capital gains distributed at year end. But instead of paying the money to you in cash, the ETF plows it back into the fund.
When a fund reinvests a distribution, it’s treated the same way for tax purposes as if you were adding new money – that is, the amount is added to your ACB. This has the effect of reducing your capital gain (or increasing your capital loss) when you ultimately sell.
To recap: ROC reduces your ACB, and reinvested distributions raise your ACB.
Unlike ROC, reinvested distributions aren’t recorded on your T3 so you’ll have to go directly to your ETF provider’s website. (With iShares ETFs, you can find the most recent reinvested distributions by looking under “resources,” and “resource library,” and then scrolling down to “press releases.” For the previous few years, you can consult the “distribution characteristics” document mentioned previously. To go even further back, look on the specific page for XIU under “distributions,” click on “view full chart,” then choose “recent” and “table.”)
I added up XIU’s reinvested distributions per unit since 2001 and got $1.46 (note: all of the per unit data appear to have been adjusted for the 2008 unit split). Multiplying this by 364 units produces total reinvested distributions of $531.44.
The investor’s new ACB (subject to any further ROC on the 2016 T3) is therefore the initial cost of $4,520.70, minus ROC of $115.13, plus reinvested distributions of $531.44, which equals $4,937.01. As you can see, the new ACB is higher than the original cost, which reduces the capital gain that the investor would otherwise have to report.
Tracking ROC and reinvested distributions can be a pain in the behind, and there are services – such as acbtracking.ca – that will do the work for you. But with tax time approaching, it’s a skill worth learning. As this example illustrates, it might even save you money.
February 2015 - ETF Investing, Winter 2015
See Page 22
April 2014 - Toronto Globe & Mail
Exorcising phantom ETF distributions
Clement Lee-Sui got a surprise when he was poking around on the iShares website.
One of his wife's exchange-traded funds, the iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE), declared a distribution of 68.2 cents per unit at the end of 2013 - its biggest distribution of the year by far.
Problem was, the vast majority of the distribution wasn't paid in cash but was reinvested by the fund. What's more, the amount that was reinvested wasn't broken out separately on his T3 tax slip or on his brokerage statement.
"I only know about [it] because I happened to check the iShares website," Mr. Lee-Sui said in an e-mail.
They're known as phantom distributions, and if you don't pay attention to them they could cost you at tax time.
Today, we'll explore what these distributions are, how you can identify them and what you need to do to make sure you don't pay more tax than you should.
In most cases, ETFs pay distributions in cash. However, occasionally an ETF will choose to reinvest some of its realized capital gains internally instead of paying the money out to unitholders.
Even though investors don't receive these reinvested distributions directly, they still have to pay tax on them (assuming the ETF is held in a taxable account, of course).
Reporting income from ETFs is straightforward. Year-end brokerage statements and T3s list the total amount of interest, dividends and capital gains, and plugging these numbers into the appropriate boxes on one's tax return is a simple affair.
The hard part is determining what portion of the capital gain was paid out in cash, and what portion - if any - was reinvested by the fund.
"It seems that the only reliable way to find out your reinvested capital gains distribution for any particular ETF is to go to the website for that ETF and check the detailed characterization for the distributions," Mr. Lee-Sui said.
Why does it matter?
When a fund automatically reinvests a distribution, it's essentially the same as if you received the money and then reinvested it yourself. In both cases, you are effectively putting new cash to work. (This is similar to what happens with a dividend reinvestment plan, or DRIP.)
As a result, you need to increase the adjusted cost base (ACB) of your investment by the amount of the reinvested distribution. (I discussed the ACB in detail in two recent columns: tgam.ca/EBRk and tgam.ca/EB2I.)
What if you fail to increase your ACB? You end up reporting a bigger capital gain - and paying more tax - than necessary when you sell the fund. That's why it's critical for investors to stay on top of reinvested distributions.
Mistakes can be costly
Such non-cash distributions "are almost always missed by holders," said Lea Hill, president of acbtracking.ca, a website that, for a fee, provides detailed ACB calculations for ETFs, closed-end funds and other investments.
Failing to account for phantom distributions can make a capital gain look a lot larger than it actually is, Mr. Hill said.
Consider the iShares S&P 500 Index ETF (XSP). Assuming an investor bought 1,000 units in 2006 for $16 each and sold them in 2013 for $21 each, the capital gain would appear to be $5,000 ($21,000 minus $16,000).
However, the investor would have also received $3,374.05 in reinvested distributions during the holding period. These phantom payments would increase the ACB to $19,374.05 from $16,000. The investor would also have received $55.06 in return of capital (ROC), which would reduce the ACB to $19,318.99 (reinvested distributions are added to the ACB, and ROC is subtracted).
The actual capital gain would therefore be $1,681.01 ($21,000 minus $19,318.99).
"Failure of the client to realize how phantoms impacted this would result in the client declaring $3,319 more in capital gains in 2013 than was owed," Mr. Hill said.
"Paying taxes twice - not a good plan!"
XSP isn't an isolated case. According to Mr. Hill, ETFs and closed-end funds have made more than 600 such distributions over the years.
Fortunately for Mr. Lee-Sui, he now knows to check the ETF provider's website every year to see which funds declared reinvested distributions.
"We do own several ETFs and it's an issue for every one of them," he said.
March 2009 -- Investment Executive
"...it really becomes a challenge for the accountant, advisor or the individual... to come up with an accurate ACB. ACB Tracking Inc., offers a Web-based service that allows clients to determine the adjusted cost base of any Canadian income trust, closed-end fund, split -share corporation or exchange-traded fund.....tax preparation professionals are saved the work of calculating the figures themselves at their hourly rates."
March, 2008 -- The Bottom Line
“ The service is quick, accurate, and not expensive. It avoids the need for a detailed cost buildup schedule. This is a valuable tool for any size firm that is responsible for client write-up and tax return preparation. ACB Tracking is a unique service that can save accounting and financial advisory firms both time and money.”
March/April 2008 -- The Canadian MoneySaver
“The 2007 taxation year was very unique for income trusts due to the number of takeovers that did not provide the election of a tax-deferred rollover. Nearly 50 income trusts were bought out for cash, with the result that each one will require ACB calculations. Some of the more widely held issues affected are……..”
March 31, 2007 -- The Victoria Times Colonist
"A Victoria company is starting a revolution in the number-addled and often complicated world of accounting. ACB Tracking Inc. has come up with a web-based, adjusted cost base calculator intended to save accountants and investment advisor's time and aggravation when preparing tax returns. The man behind it is still wondering how he's the first to market..."